中文 · EN · ES · PT
← Back to Analysis Hub
⚽ 2026 World Cup · Group F · Round 1 · Elite attack vs airtight defense 🏁 Full-time · Sweden 5-1 Tunisia

Sweden vs Tunisia

June 14, 2026 · Estadio BBVA, Monterrey · 22:00 ET · Group F · Mexico
🇸🇪 Sweden
Strike pair Isak + Gyökeres · first WC since 2018 · qualified via dramatic play-off
— VS —
🇹🇳 Tunisia
Only team in the group to qualify without conceding · fully fit · counter-attacking side

📊 Post-Match Review: Tactics & Data · Full-time Sweden 5-1 Tunisia · 06-14

① How the Goals Came

Sweden dominated from the off: Yasin Ayari fired in a long-range screamer on 7', and Isak doubled it on 30' with a low finish off a Gyökeres counter through-ball (2-0). Omar Rekik pulled one back for Tunisia on 43' (2-1), but in the second half Sweden pulled clear entirely — Gyökeres (59'), substitute Mattias Svanberg just 16 seconds after coming on (84'), and Ayari's second long-range strike in stoppage time (90+6') sealed the 5-1. Ayari's brace of long-range goals earned him man of the match, and Sweden topped Group F.

⏱ 7' Ayari · 30' Isak · 43' Rekik (TUN) · 59' Gyökeres · 84' Svanberg · 90+6' Ayari

② Key Data Comparison (Opta / ESPN)

Metric🇸🇪 Sweden🇹🇳 TunisiaRead
Possession≈54%≈46%Possession was near even, but Sweden converted almost all of their limited chances — efficiency dominance
Goal qualitySweden's 5 goals included Ayari's two long-range screamers + Svanberg's 16-second substitute flashThis shows Sweden's scoring sources are diverse (open play, counter, long range, bench), not just the two stars
Strike pairIsak scored + Gyökeres scored and assisted IsakThe pre-match call that "the ceiling rides entirely on the two stars" held; the pair were directly/indirectly involved in several goals
Tunisia's clean-sheet DNA6 qualifiers with 0 conceded → 5 conceded in this single gameThe iron bucket failed completely against an elite attack + long range; the structure was cut open

③ Tactical Review

Sweden's attacking ceiling far exceeds the "two-star dependence" pre-match picture
The pre-match thesis was "all the ceiling rides on Isak + Gyökeres," but in reality midfielder Ayari's two long-range goals + Svanberg's substitute flash show Sweden's scoring points are more spread out and three-dimensional than expected. That's bad news for later opponents: shutting down the two stars doesn't shut down Sweden.
Long range is an effective antidote to the iron bucket
Facing Tunisia's packed low block, Sweden didn't only batter the box — they solved it directly with Ayari's long range (both goals). This shows that when an opponent collapses into the box, Sweden can punish from the outside — a repeatable route to breaking a packed defense.
Tunisia's "clean-sheet myth" went bust against genuinely elite firepower
The iron bucket of 6 qualifiers with 0 conceded shipped 5 in a single game. This shows Lamouchi's low block works against qualifying-level opponents but lacks a second tier of defense against world-class individual ability (Isak/Gyökeres/long-range shooters) — once they conceded first and were forced to push up, the structure collapsed fast.
Bench depth delivered: Svanberg's 16-second flash
Scoring 16 seconds after coming on is the ultimate sample of efficient rotation. This shows this Sweden squad has the resources to rotate and still pick up points under the expanded 48-team format (a congested schedule), without staking every match on all the starters.

④ Prediction Reconciliation

Pre-match thesisResultNote
Sweden win (implied ≈50%)✓ HitA 5-1 rout — the favorite delivered, well beyond the expected margin
Base case 1-0/1-1 low-scoring grind✗ Major missBadly underrated Sweden's firepower and the speed of Tunisia's defensive collapse — the biggest prediction error
Tunisia's clean-sheet iron bucket hard to break✗ Off"Airtight" was beaten for 5 goals; too optimistic on the resilience of Tunisia's defense
Ceiling rides on Isak+Gyökeres~ Partly rightThe two stars did score, but underrated secondary firepower like Ayari/Svanberg

⑤ Carry-Forward to Next Match

🇸🇪 Sweden · Next vs Netherlands (Jun 20, Houston)

  • Firepower firing on all cylinders: the two stars + Ayari's long range + bench depth, 5 goals to top Group F — against the Netherlands (held 2-2 by Japan in their opener, inefficient finishing) it's a real test, and Sweden's strong-attack-weak-defense script will be amplified.
  • The long-range weapon is repeatable: if the Dutch also sit deep, Ayari's outside strikes remain the key.
  • Defensive risk unresolved: only 1 conceded but Tunisia's attack was limited; the Dutch front line is stronger, and Sweden's defensive gaps will be probed harder.

🇹🇳 Tunisia · Next vs Japan (Jun 21, Guadalajara)

  • The clean-sheet myth is broken: 5 conceded in one game, both mentality and structure need rebuilding; against Japan (held the Dutch 2-2, dangerous on set pieces) the low block must be reorganized.
  • The "concede first and collapse" risk: being chased down after leading 2-1 shows extreme fragility when forced to push up — against Japan they must avoid falling behind early.
  • Toothless on the counter: aside from Rekik's goal the attack was barren; they need an outlet to transition from defense to attack to take anything from Japan.

📋 Quick Summary (read this first)

A classic spear-vs-shield opener. Sweden are back at the World Cup for the first time since 2018 (they finished bottom of their regular qualifying group, slipped into the play-offs via their Nations League ranking, then survived 3-1 over Ukraine and 3-2 over Poland). They carry the tournament's sharpest strike pair — Liverpool's Alexander Isak and Arsenal's Viktor Gyökeres — but that bottom-place finish exposed inconsistent form and defensive frailty, making them hard to trust as favorites. Opposite them is a transformed Tunisia under Sabri Lamouchi (in charge since January): the only side in the group — and the first in the world — to qualify without conceding a single goal (six wins, 16 scored, 0 conceded), fully fit and built to sit deep and counter. The odds (decimal): Sweden win 1.95 (de-vigged ≈50%, a clear favorite), draw 3.55 (≈28%), Tunisia win 4.44 (≈22%) — Sweden is a clear favorite, but draw + Tunisia together still total about half the book, so the price keeps respecting Tunisia's defense. Base script: a low-scoring grind, Sweden 1-0 / 1-1.

Sweden implied (no-vig)
≈50%
Draw implied
≈28%
Tunisia qual. conceded
0
Market heat index
3/5

🔴 Key Late News · core module · sourced + why it matters

First-hand news and status signals shaping this match, each explained for how it changes tactics or the result
Sweden · team news · 06-12 multi-source
Gudmundsson a doubt with a virus; Lindelöf, Elanga, Nygren and Bernhardsson all back from minor knocks

Per preview media, left-sided Gabriel Gudmundsson has been battling a virus all week and is "touch-and-go" for Tunisia, with Daniel Svensson or Elliot Stroud as possible replacements. The good news: captain Victor Lindelöf, winger Anthony Elanga, Benjamin Nygren and Alexander Bernhardsson have all made full recoveries from minor afflictions. Isak and Gyökeres are both fit and in form.

🔑 Why it matters: against Tunisia's compact low block, Sweden need width and crosses to pry open the box — Gudmundsson's left-side delivery is exactly that channel. If he sits out, Sweden's flank threat and set-piece quality drop a notch, leaning even harder on Isak/Gyökeres to manufacture chances in tight space. [Gudmundsson's start subject to the official pre-match XI · unverified]
Sources: Sports Mole — Sweden XI · ESPN — team news/XI
Tunisia · team news · fully available
Tunisia have no notable injuries and a fully available squad; Hannibal Mejbri tipped to return, five-at-the-back expected

Tunisia enter the tournament with a complete, available squad and no injuries worth flagging. Midfield anchor Ellyes Skhiri is a guaranteed starter; ex-Manchester United man Hannibal Mejbri, now at Burnley, is expected back in the XI as a playmaker. Multiple analysts expect Lamouchi to shift to a five-man defense this summer for extra solidity against stronger sides.

🔑 Why it matters: a full squad means Tunisia can field their theoretical best three/five-at-the-back block — precisely the setup designed to choke elite strikers like Isak and Gyökeres. With Skhiri screening and Talbi anchoring the center, the runs-in-behind Sweden want get squeezed by numbers and depth; on the turnover, Hannibal and the wing-backs spark the counter.
Sources: Sports Mole — Tunisia XI · Squawka — Tunisia squad analysis
Tunisia · statistical DNA · CAF qualifying
Tunisia are the first nation in the world to qualify without conceding: six wins from six, 16 scored, 0 conceded

The Eagles of Carthage completed CAF qualifying with six wins from six, a +16 goal difference and not a single goal conceded — the first side to reach the 2026 World Cup with a clean sheet across the whole campaign. This is structural solidity, not one-match luck.

🔑 Why it matters: the central tension here is "Sweden's elite attack" vs "Tunisia's clean-sheet defense." A team that conceded nothing across a campaign tends to prioritize control and a low tempo early — which drags Sweden into the patient siege they're worst at, and feeds the under / low-scoring market profile. Caveat: qualifying opposition was weaker than World Cup level, so that record gets a real test against Isak/Gyökeres.
Sources: Goal — preview · Juvefc — clean-sheet qualifying
Match referee · confirmed · FIFA appointment
Argentine referee Yael Falcón Pérez appointed (FIFA international since 2022, known as a strict official)

FIFA has appointed Argentine referee Yael Falcón Pérez (born 1988, on the FIFA list since 2022) for this match, with compatriots Maximiliano Del Vesso and Facundo Rodríguez as alternates and Costa Rica's Juan Calderón as reserve. He refereed the 2024 Copa Argentina final and has a deep South American résumé. Full referee module below.

🔑 Why it matters: his only major-tournament sample is the 2024 Copa América (one group game, Costa Rica–Paraguay); no World Cup experience. His Argentine-league average of ≈5.86 yellows/game looks high, but the Argentine league is a notoriously card-heavy league, so that number cannot be transferred to World Cup standards (using league averages as a tournament expectation is exactly the trap that misleads card/penalty markets). This is a high-contact structure and cards could run high, but with no major-tournament or either-team sample, treat it as a variable, not a given.
Sources: Foot Africa — referee confirmed · Sweden Herald — referee

1 The Data (core)

1X2 implied probabilities (no-vig decimal odds) · qualifying goals · composite profile — all charts use verified data
1X2 implied probability (no-vig %)
Qualifying goals for/against
Decimal odds — three outcomes
Composite profile (analyst rating 0–10)

Key data comparison

Metric🇸🇪 Sweden🇹🇳 Tunisia
Road to the WCBottom of qualifying group → play-off via NL ranking → 3-1 Ukraine, 3-2 PolandCAF qualifying: six wins, 16 scored, 0 conceded
WC historyTraditional power; first appearance since 2018Regular; defense-led African representative
Top weaponIsak + Gyökeres strike pair (sharpest attack in the field)Three/five-at-the-back low block + fast counters
Core weaknessShaky defense, inconsistent form (bottom of qualifying)Clean-sheet record untested at the very top level
Head coachGraham PotterSabri Lamouchi (took over January 2026)
1X2 decimal odds1.95 (implied ≈50%)4.44 (≈22%) · draw 3.55 (≈28%)
Head-to-headRecent friendly meetings (Tunisia won 1-0); limited competitive overlap
📌 Probabilities are no-vig implied from decimal odds (≈ 50 / 28 / 22). Sweden is a clear favorite (≈50%), but draw (≈28%) + Tunisia win (≈22%) together total about half — that is how Tunisia's clean-sheet defense gets priced in, not an "evenly matched" game. The raw moneylines (Sweden -107, draw +250, Tunisia +360) have been converted to decimal per the rule.

🔥 Betting Market Heat · expert picks / odds / money / opinion

Hot on names, cool on the line: Isak/Gyökeres lift attention, the price still respects Tunisia's defense
Market heat index
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
3/5 · names raise heat + line stays measured
The star power of Isak (Liverpool) and Gyökeres (Arsenal) lifts coverage and attention, and Sweden is priced as a clear favorite (≈50%); but draw (≈28%) + Tunisia win (≈22%) together total about half, so the line keeps respecting Tunisia's clean-sheet defense. No irrational one-sided frenzy.

① Expert pick aggregation (direction count: Sweden win/Under majority · Tunisia win minority · draw isolated)

WhoRoleView / Pick
Sports MolePreview mediaNarrow Sweden win, low score
OneFootballPreview mediaSweden win + lean Under 2.5
JuvefcPreview mediaBack Sweden's attack, warn the Tunisia defense is tough
VSiNUS betting mediaLimited value on Sweden handicap, lean low score
Sports InteractionSportsbookSweden a slim favorite at open
Canada Sports BettingPreview mediaSweden win / BTTS lean No
Heat signal (mild): direction is tightly clustered on "Sweden win + Under," with almost no one backing a Tunisia win — that consensus is itself a sign that value is squeezed. Overlooked pockets: the draw (≈28% implied yet rarely tipped) and "Tunisia clean sheet / no goal conceded" markets — exactly the directions Tunisia's structure supports but the strikers' fame overshadows.

② Odds movement (decimal)

TimeMarketSweden winDrawTunisia win
CurrentComposite decimal1.953.554.44
No-vig implied≈50%≈28%≈22%
Raw moneylineAlt book-107+250+360
📌 Sweden lead clearly (≈ 50/28/22) — pricing for a "clear favorite, but low winning margin and low goal expectation": the favorite's win rate is high, but with few goals expected and a hard opposing defense, draw + loss together still total close to half. Raw moneylines converted per the rule (neg = 1+100/|x|, pos = 1+x/100): Sweden -107→1.95, draw +250→3.55, Tunisia +360→4.44. Any Asian handicap / totals lines are kept as-is, not converted.

③ Prediction markets & ④ opinion

  • Prediction markets: no clear single-match price or volume found on Kalshi / Polymarket / DefiRate for this fixture (unverified) — once live, prices should sit near the book-side ~50/28/22 band.
  • Opinion: chatter centers on Isak's move to Liverpool, Gyökeres at Arsenal and the late play-off heroics vs Poland — a star narrative driving traffic; Tunisia's side is narrower, focused on the clean-sheet run and the five-at-the-back switch.
  • Name-bias reminder: Sweden's ≈50% makes them a clear favorite, but they finished bottom of their regular qualifying group and scraped through via the play-off — that ≈50% already bakes in respect for Tunisia's defense (draw + Tunisia together total about half); "strong attack, shaky whole" is their true profile.
🧭 Read: the line sits around 50/28/22, Sweden a clear favorite, with the heat source being star strikers rather than new information. The blind spot is more likely Tunisia unbeaten/clean-sheet markets and the under — Tunisia beat France at WC2022 with this same low block, and that structure is enough to drag this into a low-scoring grind. For analysis only — not betting advice.

2 Lineups & Key Players

Predicted XIs (analyst projections, not official; the official pre-match sheet is final)

🇸🇪 Sweden predicted XI (4-4-1-1 / two strikers)

Nordfeldt; Hien · Lindelöf(C) · Lagerbielke; Bernhardsson · Karlström · Ayari · Gudmundsson(unverified); Nygren; Isak · Gyökeres
PlayerPosition/ClubRecent / Notes
Alexander IsakForward / LiverpoolStrong recent international scoring form; Sweden's primary finisher
Viktor GyökeresForward / ArsenalScored decisive play-off goals (incl. late winner vs Poland); fully fit, elite physicality
Victor Lindelöf (C)Center-back / captainRecovered from a minor knock; organizing and experience hub at the back
Gabriel GudmundssonLeft side / virus doubtStart uncertain; left-flank service is a Sweden lifeline, Svensson/Stroud as cover

🇹🇳 Tunisia predicted XI (3-5-2 / five at the back)

Dahmen; Valery · Meriah · Bronn · Talbi · Abdi; Hannibal · Skhiri · Sassi; Mastouri · Msakni
PlayerPosition/ClubRecent / Notes
Ellyes SkhiriMidfield / team coreGuaranteed starter; screening and linking, the engine of the clean-sheet defense
Hannibal MejbriMidfield / BurnleyEx-Manchester United starlet; expected back in the XI as playmaker
Montassar TalbiCenter-back / LorientHeavy minutes this season; defensive anchor
Yan Valery / Ali AbdiWing-backs / Young Boys, NiceIn a back five, balance defense with overlapping runs; counter triggers
Formation note: multiple sources give Sweden a 4-4-1-1 (Nygren behind Isak/Gyökeres), readable as a two-striker 4-4-2 variant. Tunisia are expected to shift from a back four to a three/five-at-the-back for solidity against stronger sides. Both XIs are analyst projections — the official pre-match sheet is final.

3 Tactical Style & Coaches

🇸🇪 Sweden · Graham Potter
Two strikers + width + attack over defense
  • Built a clear attacking framework around Isak/Gyökeres, stressing wide service and depth runs from the front two.
  • Script: feed the two center-forwards via crosses from Gudmundsson/Bernhardsson, with Gyökeres running in behind — attacking the space behind the defense.
  • Risk: the defensive wobble that left them bottom of qualifying is exposed to Tunisia's fast counters; one lapse can concede.
🇹🇳 Tunisia · Sabri Lamouchi (since January 2026)
3-5-2/5-3-2 low block + fast counters
  • Rebuilt the defensive structure after taking over in January; the clean-sheet qualifying run is the system's best endorsement.
  • Script: cede possession, sit in a low block, use Skhiri's screen and three center-backs to limit Isak/Gyökeres, then break fast through Hannibal and the wing-backs.
  • Risk: if Sweden cash in on set pieces or crosses, a crowded box in a back five can create chaos; limited attacking firepower makes a lead hard to extend.

🚩 Corners: Technical Read · Style × live lines · handicap & totals

Sweden lever a low block open with wing crosses and will inevitably win more corners; Tunisia park the bus and cede possession, winning far fewer and conceding more — the corner edge clearly leans Sweden, but the total is pulled both ways by the dense block and Tunisia's tempo-control approach.

① Corner profiles of both sides (style-driven)

Dimension🇸🇪 Sweden🇹🇳 TunisiaMeaning
Corner source (play-style)Sustained pressure + wing crosses (Gudmundsson) → wins plentyCede the ball, five-at-the-back sit deep → wins few, forced to concede more off clearancesThe corner differential naturally leans Sweden (no precise major-tournament corner sample; judged by play-style)
Major-tournament defensive recordStrong play-off impact, but a shaky XIWC2022 used the low block to smother France and other strong sides — many corners conceded but rarely a goalTunisia conceding more corners ≠ conceding more goals: Talbi/Bronn's aerial work mops up corners
Attacking emphasis (wing/central/press)Width + crosses (Gudmundsson's left-side service)Cede the ball, break fast on turnoversSweden's crossing is the main corner source; Tunisia rarely manufacture corners proactively
Set-piece threatHigh (Gyökeres/Lindelöf aerial targets + Isak's runs)Defense-first; limited set-piece attackSweden use corners as a genuine weapon to break a low block; Tunisia mostly react
Corner-edge leanClearly leans 🇸🇪 SwedenStyle dictates the asymmetry: Sweden attack, Tunisia defend, so the corner differential is nearly one-sided

② Live lines (corner market)

The major books (bet365 / Oddschecker / Sofascore) returned no publicly confirmed dedicated corner lines for this match. Style-based reasoned estimate (unverified): corner total line ≈ 9.5, Over ≈ 1.90 / Under ≈ 1.90 (European decimal); corner handicap ≈ Sweden −2.5 (Sweden giving 2.5 corners). Use the actual line once it posts — the above is a directional estimate, not a confirmed line.

③ Technical read (handicap & totals)

Handicap (corner spread)
Sweden continuously bombard Tunisia's five-at-the-back low block via Gudmundsson/Bernhardsson crosses, so their corner supply is naturally superior; Tunisia cede the ball and barely manufacture corners. The corner spread clearly favors Sweden — a Sweden −2.5 type line has logical style support (line unverified).
Totals (corner count)
Sweden pushing up lifts corner supply and the total; but Tunisia's clean-sheet, tempo-suppressing, play-it-safe DNA slows the overall pace, and while their deep block concedes more corners, it also reduces how often Sweden reach dangerous crossing zones. The two forces offset: the ceiling is raised by Sweden's attack, the floor pressed down by Tunisia's tempo control. The baseline lean is neutral-to-Under (consistent with the overall "low-scoring grind" picture), but if Sweden can't break through early and shift to volume crossing and long shots, the corner count can also be pushed up — the total is genuinely two-sided.
Variables & two-sidedness
Parking the bus inevitably concedes more corners, helping Sweden's edge; but the crowded box of a back five plus Talbi/Bronn's aerial defense mean Sweden's set-piece conversion may not be efficient even with more corners. Game state is the key variable: if Tunisia concede first and are forced to push up, the corner-supply structure flips; if it stays 0-0, Tunisia retreat deeper, widening the corner gap but slowing the pace further. Whether Gudmundsson starts directly affects Sweden's crossing quality and corner output.
For analysis only — not betting advice. Sources: Corner-Stats — Sweden data · Oddschecker — odds · Sofascore — Sweden (dedicated corner lines not found; estimates marked unverified)

4 Match Referee & Officiating Context (major-tournament actuals)

Confirmed: Argentina's Yael Falcón Pérez (born 1988, FIFA international since 2022). Alternates Del Vesso and Rodríguez (both Argentina); reserve Calderón of Costa Rica.

Quantitative tendency (grounded in major-tournament actuals · two-sided caveat)

  • Tiny major-tournament sample: his only top-level outing is one group game at Copa América 2024 (Costa Rica vs Paraguay); no World Cup experience. That single game is not enough to infer his tournament threshold.
  • Don't pass off league averages as a tournament expectation: his Argentine-league figure runs high (≈ 5.86 yellows/game in 2024/25, ≈4.71 career) — but the Argentine league is itself a notoriously card-heavy league, so that number cannot be transferred straight to the World Cup (tournaments usually warn earlier and book less freely; the standards differ widely). Using league averages as a tournament expectation is exactly the trap that most often misleads card/penalty markets.
  • History vs both teams: no retrievable sample with either Sweden or Tunisia (stated plainly).
  • Match impact: the high-contact structure ("Sweden crossing + Tunisia's dense counter-press") could indeed yield more cards, but with no major-tournament or either-team sample, card counts and penalties are a variable, not a given; betting card markets off league averages is not advised.

5 Analyst Insights · with last-2-major cross-reference

Sweden · last 2 majors · WC2018 quarter-final + Euro2020 R16, then absent
Sweden's last major appearances were the 2018 World Cup (quarter-final) and Euro 2020 (R16, lost to Ukraine in extra time) — that was the Forsberg-era counter-attacking unit, not this team; they then missed both the 2022 World Cup and Euro 2024 (their first Euro absence in 28 years). Only Lindelöf (2018, 4 games) and Isak (Euro2020, 4 games) have major-tournament caps, and the Isak+Gyökeres luxury attack has never played a major together. Elite firepower, but near-zero big-tournament composure and tempo-control experience, and they scraped through via the play-off — that is the real hazard beneath the favorite's billing.
Tunisia · last 2 majors · WC2022 beat France but still exited + AFCON2023 group exit
Tunisia's two majors are two sides of the same script: at the 2022 World Cup they beat reigning champions France 1-0 (Khazri's goal), proving the bunker can topple a top side in a single game, yet they still went out in the group — extending the fact they have never escaped a World Cup group, ever; AFCON 2023 was worse, a group exit with 0 wins and a loss to Namibia. The profile is clear — "can park the bus and steal one, but can't break teams down or progress." Against Sweden, that is both their favored script (defend a strong side, nick a goal) and their ceiling (very hard to win the whole game).
Market view · price signal
Sweden's ≈50% makes them a clear favorite, but draw (≈28%) + Tunisia win (≈22%) together total about half — the market is using half the probability to price "Tunisia's defense + Sweden's overall instability." The underrated side is more likely Tunisia unbeaten/clean-sheet markets and the under, not a big Sweden win.

6 Synthesis & To Verify

  • Result lean: a low-scoring grind, Sweden 1-0 / 1-1, is the base script; Tunisia's realistic path is to absorb the early pressure and counter for a point or steal a goal.
  • Key men: Isak, Gyökeres (SWE / the entire attacking ceiling), Gudmundsson (SWE / left-flank service · start unverified), Skhiri (TUN / defensive engine), Hannibal (TUN / counter trigger).
  • Swing factor: Sweden's efficiency at crossing and breaking down the block with two strikers vs Tunisia's depth and counter conversion; whether Gudmundsson starts is the single variable on the flank.
  • Market view: Sweden a clear favorite (≈50/28/22), heat driven by star strikers; the overlooked pockets are Tunisia unbeaten/clean-sheet markets and the under (Tunisia beat France at WC2022 with this same structure).
To verify: ① Gudmundsson's start per the official pre-match sheet; ② both predicted XIs are analyst projections; ③ Falcón Pérez stats come from public third-party trackers with differing definitions and no big-tournament/either-team sample; ④ no Kalshi/Polymarket/DefiRate single-match price or volume found; ⑤ head-to-head subject to official records.

Sources

2026 World Cup Analysis Hub · Data through 2026-06-14 (probability basis corrected; incl. last-2-major cross-reference) · Charts use verified data; radar is an analyst composite · For analysis only — not betting advice